January 16, 2008 at 2:19 am (just for fun, skepticism)
Now, I’m not immune from the affliction of carrying two conflicting ideas in my head at the same time, after all, this is a blog based on two ideas that are pretty incongruous. Sometimes, though, when I see it in others it cracks me up.
Like these gems I got off of Fundies Say The Darndest Things:
I often debate with evolutionists because I believe that they are narrow mindedly and dogmatically accepting evolution without questioning it. I don’t really care how God did what He did. I know He did it.
TexasSky, Christian Forums [2006-Aug-24]
If your original Hebrew disagrees with my original King James — your original Hebrew is wrong. If your original Hebrew agrees with my original King James, your original Hebrew is right.
AV1611VET, Christian Forums [2006-Jul-20]
You are banned. You are not a Christian for Christians don’t accuse brothers and sisters in Christ of being non-Christian.
Troy, Bibliocality [2006-Feb-07]
Jesus is not a Jew. Jesus was Jewish.
awesomelegend, gaiaonline.com [2006-Nov-18]
Ah, that was a good hearty laugh.
My husband said it, “And people wonder why I’m so elitist!”
1 Comment
January 12, 2008 at 1:23 am (rant, skepticism, utopia)
Tags: behavior, golden rule, human nature, morality, utopia
Last year I read The Science of Good and Evil by Michael Shermer. I’ve always been interested in human behavior, that is, why we behave the way we do, and I found the book to be a fascinating look at morality from a secular, scientific, evolutionary point of view. Humans are, after all, merely animals like any other, but with complicated behaviors that often seem difficult to predict. I think people, especially philosophers and religious folks, tend to think that because humans are capable of reason and intellect, we can somehow overcome human nature.
The problem with any utopia is that it fails to take into account actual human behavioral patterns. As I postulated when I was around 12 or 13 years old (and having my first “deep, profound thoughts”), in a perfect world, there would be no need for the words “thank you” or “I’m sorry”. The appreciation and remorse would be understood. In a perfect world, people would never need to thank each other, because people would simply always share. It would be the norm and so thanking someone would be redundant and pointless. In a perfect world, no one would intentionally cause anyone harm, so any harm done by another person would be merely accidental, and of course, they would be sorry and the person harmed would not be angry at them. However, we don’t live in a perfect world. People are jerks. People lie. People cheat. People steal. People do petty crap. People are sometimes lazy and sometimes selfish. It just the way we evolved and for a good reason. Read the rest of this entry »
2 Comments
January 12, 2008 at 12:42 am (utopia)
Tags: tree house
Leave a Comment
January 12, 2008 at 12:40 am (just for fun)

I think I missed points on the physics questions.
Just another stupid blog thingie. I’ll make a real post soon, don’t worry.
Leave a Comment