Fads Destroy Meaning

Take Uggs. They are ugly boots made in Australia. Australians only really wear them around the house or to shuffle out to the bottle shop, or to warm one’s feet after doing a little winter surfing. Anyone who wears them all the time is considered, well, a bit “daggy.” Somehow, in America a few years ago, they gained  popularity among surfers, became high fashion chic which then became a fad among celebrities and suburban moms. Aussies are still puzzled, and a bit embarrassed.

Take trucker hats. A few years ago Hollywood hipsters started wearing them as an ironic rebellion. As in, “I’m so hip, I can wear this terrible piece of clothing that people associate with the lowest common denominator and still be hip. Look at me, I’m soooo ironic.” Then, people who didn’t get the irony started wearing them, and finally, they came full circle and only frat boys and people with no fashion sense were wearing them again. They lost their irony, and gained a new negative connotation.

Going back further, look at “grunge” fashion. It started in the independent alternative music scene in Washington and Seattle. Flannel shirts, knitted caps and thermal underwear were popular because they were  cheap, warm and the musicians were poor and really mostly cared about their music, not what they were wearing. Then, suddenly, grunge music took off and everyone started wearing flannel, thermals, knitted caps and ripped clothing. The original fashion of apathy became a symbol of caring too much, once you could buy pre-ripped jeans and overpriced distressed flannels at the mall.

Now, there’s a silly (arrgh, must resist using the word “kerfuffle”) spat over Rachel Ray’s Dunkin’ Donut ad where she wears a keffiyeh. Sure, it may have started as a way for celebs to show support for Palestinians, or to protest the war or whatever, but as far as I can tell, nobody is wearing them because of that anymore. They fly off the shelves, but they seem to just be another trendy scarf. The original symbolism is lost. I won’t wear one because I don’t like to buy things that everyone else is wearing. Other people have the opposite fashion criteria.  Rachel Ray is just a fashion victim, not a jihadi supporter. Indicting people because of the supposed symbolism of an item of clothing that has become simply a fad is absurd. You might as well tell Americans that they shouldn’t wear Uggs because in their homeland of Australia, only bogans wear them.

An open letter to Sharon Stone

This is in response to this article from SFGate.com

Dear Ms. Stone,

First of all I admire your stance against the Chinese government’s actions in Tibet. I generally like to see celebrities use their undeserved status in society to raise awareness about important issues. However, you have made a grievous error in your recent statements about the tragic earthquakes in China.

Do not fall into the trap of blaming the Chinese people for the brutal policies of the Chinese government. Was hurricane Katrina “karma” for the U.S.’s involvement in Iraq? Was the cyclone in Burma “karma” for the military junta’s treatment of political dissidents in 2007? The citizens of these countries are not necessarily responsible for the actions of their governments. In fact, many of them are victims themselves of their government’s unethical practices.

You’ve stated that the Dalai Lama is your “good friend.” Well let me tell you about my friend, Lama D. He was a monk in Tibet. There are strict rules for the practice of religion in Tibet, including a ban on images of the Dalai Lama, who is seen as a terrorist and a threat to the government. My good friend Lama was arrested and tortured by the Chinese government for having a single picture of his spiritual leader under his bed. He managed to escape to Nepal and move to California, where I worked with him in a warehouse. He was no longer a monk, but still very spiritual and an admirer of the Dalai Lama. When he told me his story he was very careful to say that the Chinese people were good, the people were not to blame, but the Chinese government was “very, very bad.”

You have done a disservice to yourself by saying that these innocent people deserved their tragic circumstances. It’s as bad as saying a woman deserved to be raped because she was “asking for it”. Your callous remarks reveal your ignorance not only about politics but about the very concept of Karma itself. 20,000 children for 16 protesters. Is it a fair trade? The Chinese people did not deserve this misery any more than anyone else. Nobody deserves to have their lives destroyed, their homes turned to rubble or their children killed, whether by a government, a fringe military group, a war or an act of nature.

To show real compassion, you must transcend your hatred for nations, and love the people within them. I respect your opinions about the rights of the Tibetan people, but your hate filled comments sadden and anger me. If you truly cared about relieving suffering, you would open your heart to all who suffer, not just your favourite pet group. We are all human, after all.

Sincerely,

Elizabeth McRae

Superstitions Among Roleplaying Gamers

Buy this nifty ring at etsy.com

(Buy this ring here!)

I just finished the fourth official episode of Natural 20 (a podcast about roleplaying gamer culture), which is our exploration of superstitions in roleplaying games.

I, of course, played the skeptic, while Emma played the believer.

Most of the superstitions surrounding gaming have to do with dice. Actually, pretty much all of them do. What I deduce from this is that since the dice are the randomising agent in gaming, they are the subject of superstitions. They are the aspect over which the player has no control, so superstitions, rituals and rules about them give the player a sense of control.

Through an informal survey on the RPGmeetup.com forum, I found that of the people that took the survey (n=13), most (58%) had habits or rituals that they performed, knowing full well that they had no way of influencing the dice. This was not really surprising, as roleplaying gamers tend to be rather analytical and educated, but seem to enjoy the idea of the supernatural even if they do not believe in it. What surprised me was how elaborate these rituals were and how anal people were about them. Also, if a person rolled well, they were less likely to care about their dice rules than if they rolled poorly. The rules only seemed to come into play as a remedy for a bad streak than a way of ensuring a good streak.

I performed a “road test” of some of the dice superstitions: I named my dice, I carried them in a container I imbued with specialness, I only rolled on my notebook, not the table, and I set my die at 20 when at rest. I did roll well during that game. I didn’t call this exercise an experiment because, obviously, it wasn’t. I was just giving the behaviours a try.

In the follow-up discussion and analysis of our findings, Emma had a very interesting point: Part of the reason to play a roleplaying game and not a videogame is that it is random. The randomising agent (dice) is the only thing that keeps it from just being a story. So, is there any point to trying to influence your dice? If the GM is making important plot points dependent on rolls in order to move the story forward, then perhaps the GM isn’t doing her job properly. So maybe, even if we do (secretly) want to believe we can influence dice, we shouldn’t even try to do so.

Anyway, it will all be available for listening soon at Natural20podcast.blogspot.com

Oh yeah, and I wanted to use Superstition by Stevie Wonder during the break between the two parts, but we couldn’t use copyrighted music. There will be a sound-alike song instead called “It’s All Humbug.” I won’t tell you who performed it, but I will say she wrote it especially for the episode and it only took 20 minutes, so please be kind.

I promise I’ll do a real post soon..

This just seemed to follow that giraffe clip rather nicely:

Thanks to icanhascheezburger.com

I will do one more post before heading back to the U.S.

Then, upon returning, I plan to write about my experiences at TAM6.

In the meantime, allow me to plug my podcast:

Natural 20 – It’s mostly about roleplaying games, the gaming community and the rewards and challenges of the gaming experience. There are two episodes (though technically, three, but only two official ones) up currently, with a third (official) one coming shortly, and there will be a fourth episode coming up next week where we explore gaming superstitions.

The truth about Nessie

I just bought this new t-shirt.

Heehee. It’s got a puppet.

Neanderthin?

That\'s one hot humanoid.This is the mental image I get whenever I hear about this new-ish title for the old “Paleo” diet.

There’s nothing wrong with these kind of diets, per se, it’s just that, well, I don’t think it’s a very good name.

After all, the Neanderthals DIED OUT.

They were outcompeted and were basically an evolutionary dead end. We survived because we developed different strategies for survival that were more adaptable to different environments. Then, eventually we created agriculture, which was a great leap forward in our ability to feed large groups.
In order to get the benefits from this so called “cave-man” diet, we depend on our ability to grow crops (maybe they should call it the “Bronze age” diet).
Basically, it’s a romantic misnomer for a diet consisting of good, healthy raw foods and quality proteins.
You don’t have to carry a spear and wear mammoth skins to get the benefits of that.

In the end, it’s all marketing.